H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Fernando Luna H2H: 2-0
Paolo Cane holds a 2–0 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1988 Bastad quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 1988* | Bastad | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-2 6-2 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
| Jul 11, 1986* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 7-6 6-2 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |