H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Paolo Cane vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-0

Paolo Cane holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1990 Wellington quarterfinal 7-6 2-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Cane
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Gilad Bloom
ISR Age 59 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Cane #42 7-6 2-6 6-3 Gilad Bloom #122 Match data Jan 6, 1990* QF Wellington ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Cane #1,381 #26 565 1,853 124 123 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Gilad Bloom #1,295 #61 524 1,749 83 105 44.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Cane Gilad Bloom
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1984 1–1 50.0% #385 1,503 0 0
18 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,482 0 0 1985 1–1 50.0% #452 1,505 0 0
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #555 1,457 0 0 1986 2–1 66.7% #152 1,538 0 0
20 1985 2–5 28.6% #199 1,450 0 0 1987 10–16 38.5% #139 1,546 0 0
21 1986 23–14 62.2% #44 1,668 0 1 1988 6–12 33.3% #210 1,550 0 0
22 1987 20–16 55.6% #51 1,706 0 1 1989 5–6 45.5% #105 1,569 0 0
23 1988 15–18 45.5% #81 1,704 0 1 1990 25–21 54.3% #66 1,736 0 0
24 1989 24–14 63.2% #33 1,756 0 2 1991 15–24 38.5% #125 1,635 0 0
25 1990 15–16 48.4% #109 1,688 0 2 1992 14–15 48.3% #137 1,662 0 0
26 1991 8–6 57.1% #122 1,688 0 3 1993 2–4 33.3% #167 1,634 0 0
27 1992 7–10 41.2% #163 1,656 0 3 1994 2–3 40.0% #217 1,623 0 0
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #177 1,598 0 3 1995 0–1 0.0% #407 1,612 0 0
29 1994 6–10 37.5% #145 1,600 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 1995 0–1 0.0% #635 1,583 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Cane Gilad Bloom
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1988 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 17 14 31 54.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1991 14 16 30 46.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 — — — — 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 21 41 48.8% 87 79 166 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% — 55 60 115 47.8% 9 21 30 30.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 9 12 21 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 51/58 of Paolo Cane's and 68/80 of Gilad Bloom's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paolo Cane Gilad Bloom
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 34/39 2.1 2.3 62.5% 66.8% 48.2% 55.3% 43.3% 59.7% 38.2%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 24/29 2.3 3.0 64.5% 64.6% 49.2% 56.2% 42.2% 59.1% 38.2%
26 1991 10/14 6.3 1.3 51.0% 71.3% 51.5% 63.4% 48.6% 62.1% 39.8% 1993 5/6 2.0 3.4 66.2% 67.9% 46.4% 57.3% 53.1% 60.5% 39.2%
27 1992 16/17 5.7 2.2 54.6% 71.3% 51.8% 56.6% 36.8% 62.4% 37.4% 1994 4/5 3.0 1.5 60.9% 62.6% 47.4% 46.3% 43.1% 56.5% 41.9%
28 1993 9/10 5.7 2.2 52.2% 72.0% 45.6% 58.6% 33.5% 59.7% 37.1% 1995 1/1 0.0 1.0 46.3% 60.0% 34.5% 50.0% 40.0% 46.3% 40.0%
29 1994 15/16 3.9 2.0 48.5% 66.8% 47.1% 55.9% 42.1% 56.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1/1 4.0 1.0 45.5% 50.0% 37.5% 44.4% — 43.2% 20.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51/247 5.3 1.9 51.5% 69.7% 49.0% 57.8% 39.3% 59.8% 37.8% — 68/188 2.2 2.5 63.1% 65.8% 48.2% 55.1% 43.6% 59.1% 38.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Cane Gilad Bloom
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1504 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.36
18 1983 1482 102.2 — — — — +62 — — 30.8% -1.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46 1985 1506 101.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — +0.41
19 1984 1457 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.28 1986 1539 115.3 — — — — +41 — — 62.5% +1.25 1–1 — — +0.23
20 1985 1451 106.2 — — — — — -2 — 35.3% -0.76 0–2 0–1 — +0.43 1987 1546 112.7 — — — — +44 -44 0 40.5% -0.92 6–5 (55%) 5–4 (56%) — +2.10
21 1986 1668 140.6 — — — — -133 +42 — 56.8% +0.29 13–8 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.85 1988 1550 124.8 — — — — +10 -16 — 41.2% -0.45 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.23
22 1987 1706 138.9 — — — — -92 +43 — 51.0% +0.05 8–4 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.47 1989 1570 117.7 — — — — +29 — — 40.7% -0.41 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.89
23 1988 1705 131.4 — — — — +2 -25 — 45.7% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.73 1990 1736 132.7 — — — — +3 -224 -113 50.0% -0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.07
24 1989 1756 138.8 — — — — -79 +94 — 57.8% +0.27 9–1 (90%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.63 1991 1635 129.6 -1.33 -0.10 0.947 48.9% +36 -169 -26 43.3% -0.34 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) — -1.07
25 1990 1689 130.4 — — — — +19 +67 — 48.6% -0.24 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.16 1992 1662 122.5 -2.20 -0.46 0.933 48.8% +11 -173 -51 48.7% -0.14 5–5 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.91
26 1991 1689 122.0 +0.78 +0.31 1.049 51.3% -42 +118 — 55.9% +0.38 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.45 1993 1635 107.0 +0.30 +0.70 0.994 50.2% +14 — — 40.0% -0.47 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
27 1992 1657 119.9 +0.98 -1.30 0.996 49.7% -14 +70 — 45.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.12 1994 1623 114.8 +0.78 +0.24 0.963 48.9% — -113 — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.05
28 1993 1599 109.2 -0.36 -0.69 0.919 48.3% +27 +55 — 38.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 1995 1613 102.1 +0.57 -1.46 0.745 43.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.11
29 1994 1601 126.5 -2.00 -0.22 0.884 47.5% — +49 — 36.1% -1.08 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1583 93.4 -0.27 -2.52 0.352 32.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1854 137.8 -0.20 -0.58 0.939 48.8% -32 +51 — 49.0% -0.14 52–39 (57%) 46–43 (52%) 106.8 +0.04 — 1749 130.0 -1.37 -0.17 0.942 48.9% +21 -113 -54 45.0% -0.33 31–36 (46%) 23–32 (42%) 99.0 +1.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.