H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-0
Paolo Cane holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1989 Monte Carlo third round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 73
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 1989* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 7-6 6-1 | Jimmy Connors | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Jimmy Connors | #1,295 | #1 | 875 | 2,410 | 1,262 | 294 | 81.1% | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 99 | 109 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Jimmy Connors | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 23–13 | 63.9% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 76–25 | 75.2% | — | 1,991 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 86–16 | 84.3% | #3 | 2,152 | 0 | 17 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 95–6 | 94.1% | #1 | 2,301 | 3 | 32 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 79–10 | 88.8% | #1 | 2,260 | 3 | 41 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 97–8 | 92.4% | #1 | 2,370 | 4 | 53 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 69–15 | 82.1% | #1 | 2,271 | 4 | 61 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 67–6 | 91.8% | #1 | 2,326 | 5 | 71 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 78–12 | 86.7% | #2 | 2,272 | 5 | 79 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 73–15 | 83.0% | #3 | 2,197 | 5 | 85 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 59–12 | 83.1% | #2 | 2,162 | 5 | 89 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 78–11 | 87.6% | #2 | 2,263 | 7 | 96 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 52–11 | 82.5% | #3 | 2,193 | 8 | 100 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 69–12 | 85.2% | #2 | 2,240 | 8 | 105 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #4 | 2,133 | 8 | 105 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #8 | 2,013 | 8 | 105 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #4 | 1,985 | 8 | 105 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 40–11 | 78.4% | #7 | 2,020 | 8 | 107 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #14 | 1,957 | 8 | 109 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #936 | 1,881 | 8 | 109 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #49 | 1,887 | 8 | 109 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #84 | 1,774 | 8 | 109 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #370 | 1,717 | 8 | 109 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #672 | 1,681 | 8 | 109 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #419 | 1,673 | 8 | 109 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,665 | 8 | 109 |