Paolo Cane
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 6, 1990 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 11, 1988 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Paolo Cane holds a 2–0 lead over Joakim Nystrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1987 Miami Open round of 64 6-1 6-3 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | 6-1 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data | Feb 25, 1987* | R64 | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Paolo Cane | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data | Jul 24, 1986* | R32 | Swedish Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,853 | 124 | 123 | 50.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,121 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,706 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,943 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #81 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,926 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,879 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,688 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,730 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,583 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1981 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 22 | 11 | 33 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1984 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 83.3% | 30 | 10 | 40 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 9 | 22 | 59.1% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1985 | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | 23 | 7 | 30 | 76.7% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% |
| 23 | 1988 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1986 | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 18 | 5 | 23 | 78.3% |
| 24 | 1989 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1987 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 25 | 1990 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1988 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 1991 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1989 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1992 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 20 | 21 | 41 | 48.8% | 87 | 79 | 166 | 52.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 16 | 20 | 36 | 44.4% | — | 60 | 31 | 91 | 65.9% | 138 | 70 | 208 | 66.3% | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 36 | 23 | 59 | 61.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1492 | 101.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.05 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1482 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | +62 | — | — | 30.8% | -1.61 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.46 | 1981 | 1645 | 133.9 | — | — | — | — | -78 | +23 | -103 | 46.8% | -0.24 | 5–1 (83%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | -0.49 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1457 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.20 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.28 | 1982 | 1618 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -103 | +115 | — | 43.5% | -0.32 | 2–4 (33%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.22 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1451 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | — | -2 | — | 35.3% | -0.76 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.43 | 1983 | 1868 | 149.9 | — | — | — | — | -235 | -70 | -111 | 63.6% | +0.95 | 10–5 (67%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | +0.17 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1668 | 140.6 | — | — | — | — | -133 | +42 | — | 56.8% | +0.29 | 13–8 (62%) | 9–4 (69%) | — | +0.85 | 1984 | 1969 | 153.9 | — | — | — | — | -39 | -15 | -234 | 65.1% | +0.98 | 19–4 (83%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -0.15 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1706 | 138.9 | — | — | — | — | -92 | +43 | — | 51.0% | +0.05 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–7 (46%) | — | -0.47 | 1985 | 1943 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +8 | +26 | -150 | 65.8% | +1.19 | 12–9 (57%) | 12–5 (71%) | — | +0.33 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1705 | 131.4 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -25 | — | 45.7% | -0.26 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -0.73 | 1986 | 1926 | 163.8 | — | — | — | — | +108 | +4 | -113 | 70.2% | +1.58 | 13–7 (65%) | 11–5 (69%) | — | -0.15 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1756 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | -79 | +94 | — | 57.8% | +0.27 | 9–1 (90%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -0.63 | 1987 | 1880 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +138 | -78 | 62.8% | +0.97 | 9–5 (64%) | 9–5 (64%) | — | -0.40 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1689 | 130.4 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +67 | — | 48.6% | -0.24 | 7–3 (70%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -0.16 | 1988 | 1730 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +3 | +142 | +66 | 47.5% | +0.11 | 5–3 (63%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -1.25 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1689 | 122.0 | +0.78 | +0.31 | 1.049 | 51.3% | -42 | +118 | — | 55.9% | +0.38 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | — | +0.45 | 1989 | 1608 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | +152 | — | 30.8% | -1.92 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.53 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1657 | 119.9 | +0.98 | -1.30 | 0.996 | 49.7% | -14 | +70 | — | 45.2% | -0.12 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–5 (29%) | — | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 1599 | 109.2 | -0.36 | -0.69 | 0.919 | 48.3% | +27 | +55 | — | 38.5% | -0.85 | 2–4 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 1601 | 126.5 | -2.00 | -0.22 | 0.884 | 47.5% | — | +49 | — | 36.1% | -1.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | -0.94 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 1583 | 93.4 | -0.27 | -2.52 | 0.352 | 32.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1854 | 137.8 | -0.20 | -0.58 | 0.939 | 48.8% | -32 | +51 | — | 49.0% | -0.14 | 52–39 (57%) | 46–43 (52%) | 106.8 | +0.04 | — | 2121 | 156.2 | — | — | — | — | +2 | +44 | -117 | 60.9% | +0.82 | 76–41 (65%) | 57–41 (58%) | 108.6 | -0.43 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jan 6, 1990 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 1 | 4 | 5 | May 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 3 | 2 | 5 | Sep 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Magnus Gustafsson | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 9, 1989 | H2H |
| Martin Jaite | 0 | 5 | 5 | Aug 11, 1988 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 12 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 6 | 10 | Aug 31, 1988 | H2H |
| Henrik Sundstrom | 3 | 5 | 8 | Jun 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 6 | 7 | Apr 23, 1988 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 2 | 5 | 7 | Sep 6, 1986 | H2H |