H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 2-0
Paolo Cane holds a 2–0 lead over Joakim Nystrom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1987 Key Biscayne second round 6-1 6-3 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 1987* | Key Biscayne | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Paolo Cane | 6-1 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1986* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 2-6 6-4 6-4 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |