H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Pablo Arraya H2H: 2-1
Paolo Cane holds a 2–1 lead over Pablo Arraya in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1988 Barcelona second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 1988* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-1 6-3 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
| Jun 9, 1988* | Bologna | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pablo Arraya | 6-4 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| May 14, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paolo Cane | 6-1 6-4 | Pablo Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pablo Arraya | #1,187 | #29 | 348 | 1,821 | 168 | 168 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Pablo Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #91 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #37 | 1,750 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #39 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #60 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #169 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #312 | 1,488 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,501 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #121 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #174 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |