H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Tarik Benhabiles H2H: 0-2
Tarik Benhabiles holds a 2–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tarik Benhabiles leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Tarik Benhabiles won the 1986 Barcelona third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 61
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1986* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 6-4 6-1 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
| May 10, 1984* | Florence | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tarik Benhabiles | 1-6 7-6 6-3 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tarik Benhabiles | #1,262 | #22 | 387 | 1,767 | 69 | 105 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Tarik Benhabiles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #616 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #71 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #134 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #230 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #113 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #107 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #177 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |