H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Paolo Cane vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 0-1
Tim Mayotte holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 7-6 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Tim Mayotte | 7-6 6-0 6-1 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Cane | Tim Mayotte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 |