H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Paolo Cane vs Tomas Smid H2H: 3-1

Paolo Cane holds a 3–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paolo Cane leads 3–0 on clay, while Tomas Smid leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1987 Italian Open round of 64 4-6 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Cane
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Cane #45 4-6 6-3 6-3 Tomas Smid #55 Match data May 13, 1987* R64 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Tomas Smid #55 6-3 6-2 Paolo Cane #40 Match data Oct 23, 1986* R32 Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard
Paolo Cane #208 4-6 6-4 7-5 Tomas Smid #33 Match data May 15, 1986* R32 Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Paolo Cane #321 3-6 6-3 7-6 Tomas Smid #23 Match data Apr 11, 1986* R16 Bari ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Cane #1,381 #26 565 1,853 124 123 50.2% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Cane Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 0–2 0.0% #555 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 2–5 28.6% #199 1,450 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1986 23–14 62.2% #44 1,668 0 1 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1987 20–16 55.6% #51 1,706 0 1 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1988 15–18 45.5% #81 1,704 0 1 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1989 24–14 63.2% #33 1,756 0 2 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1990 15–16 48.4% #109 1,688 0 2 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1991 8–6 57.1% #122 1,688 0 3 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 1992 7–10 41.2% #163 1,656 0 3 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 1993 3–7 30.0% #177 1,598 0 3 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 1994 6–10 37.5% #145 1,600 0 3 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 1995 0–1 0.0% #635 1,583 0 3 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Cane Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1983 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1988 9 6 15 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1990 3 3 6 50.0% 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 1993 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 1994 — — — — 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 20 21 41 48.8% 87 79 166 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 16 20 36 44.4% — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Cane Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1983 1482 102.2 — — — — +62 — — 30.8% -1.61 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1457 100.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1451 106.2 — — — — — -2 — 35.3% -0.76 0–2 0–1 — +0.43 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1986 1668 140.6 — — — — -133 +42 — 56.8% +0.29 13–8 (62%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.85 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1987 1706 138.9 — — — — -92 +43 — 51.0% +0.05 8–4 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -0.47 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1988 1705 131.4 — — — — +2 -25 — 45.7% -0.26 5–6 (45%) 8–9 (47%) — -0.73 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1989 1756 138.8 — — — — -79 +94 — 57.8% +0.27 9–1 (90%) 9–5 (64%) — -0.63 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1990 1689 130.4 — — — — +19 +67 — 48.6% -0.24 7–3 (70%) 5–4 (56%) — -0.16 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1991 1689 122.0 +0.78 +0.31 1.049 51.3% -42 +118 — 55.9% +0.38 2–2 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.45 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 1992 1657 119.9 +0.98 -1.30 0.996 49.7% -14 +70 — 45.2% -0.12 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) — +0.12 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 1993 1599 109.2 -0.36 -0.69 0.919 48.3% +27 +55 — 38.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.35 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 1994 1601 126.5 -2.00 -0.22 0.884 47.5% — +49 — 36.1% -1.08 3–3 (50%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.94 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 1995 1583 93.4 -0.27 -2.52 0.352 32.9% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.09 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1854 137.8 -0.20 -0.58 0.939 48.8% -32 +51 — 49.0% -0.14 52–39 (57%) 46–43 (52%) 106.8 +0.04 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.