H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Paolo Lorenzi vs Gilles Muller H2H: 2-2

Paolo Lorenzi and Gilles Muller are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Gilles Muller leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2017 US Open second round 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Gilles Muller
LUX Age 43 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Lorenzi #40 6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(4) 6-3 Gilles Muller #23 Match data Aug 31, 2017* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Gilles Muller #55 4-6 4-6 7-6(1) 7-6(5) 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #86 Match data May 26, 2015* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Paolo Lorenzi #49 7-5 6-4 Gilles Muller #65 Match data Mar 9, 2013* R128 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Gilles Muller #81 6-3 6-4 Paolo Lorenzi #82 Match data Oct 20, 2012* QF Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Gilles Muller #966 #21 1,930 2,076 203 202 50.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Gilles Muller
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #255 1,488 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2003 0–1 0.0% #195 1,450 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2004 10–8 55.6% #69 1,600 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2005 20–21 48.8% #76 1,728 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2006 11–20 35.5% #105 1,534 0 0
24 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0 2007 2–3 40.0% #117 1,577 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0 2008 5–6 45.5% #95 1,672 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% #248 1,632 0 0
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0 2010 2–2 50.0% #134 1,610 0 0
28 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0 2011 14–11 56.0% #54 1,797 0 0
29 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0 2012 21–21 50.0% #67 1,839 0 0
30 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0 2013 2–8 20.0% #368 1,678 0 0
31 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0 2014 4–6 40.0% #47 1,737 0 0
32 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0 2015 31–24 56.4% #38 1,893 0 0
33 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0 2016 35–24 59.3% #34 1,968 0 0
34 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1 2017 32–18 64.0% #25 1,943 0 2
35 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1 2018 9–19 32.1% #138 1,689 0 2
36 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1 — — — — — — —
39 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Gilles Muller
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 12 11 23 52.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 10 18 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2012 14 14 28 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
30 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2014 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 23 18 41 56.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
33 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 22 17 39 56.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 13 5 18 72.2% — — — —
34 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2017 16 12 28 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
35 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 5 10 15 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — —
36 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — — — — — 137 131 268 51.1% 19 30 49 38.8% 45 36 81 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's and 397/405 of Gilles Muller's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Gilles Muller
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 13.0 3.0 60.4% 77.6% 38.6% 70.0% 25.0% 62.2% 34.3%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/1 3.0 3.0 49.2% 56.7% 67.7% 33.3% 25.0% 62.3% 40.3%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 18/18 8.2 3.0 61.1% 70.3% 53.4% 48.8% 53.1% 63.5% 36.9%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 41/41 9.2 3.6 60.8% 73.4% 50.7% 64.0% 42.8% 64.5% 31.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 31/31 9.1 3.8 61.0% 72.5% 48.9% 64.2% 32.8% 63.0% 32.9%
24 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0% 2007 5/5 15.6 3.6 66.8% 72.1% 50.4% 56.1% 41.8% 64.9% 33.6%
25 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5% 2008 11/11 19.4 4.0 61.7% 77.1% 48.6% 69.2% 32.8% 66.0% 28.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 12.3 3.5 60.5% 74.5% 51.2% 57.7% 29.7% 65.5% 30.0%
27 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9% 2010 4/4 17.3 3.3 64.5% 81.3% 58.3% 50.0% 16.8% 72.8% 26.6%
28 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2% 2011 25/25 15.5 3.1 60.2% 80.0% 49.9% 63.1% 42.9% 68.4% 29.4%
29 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6% 2012 40/42 13.5 3.1 62.1% 81.2% 47.5% 64.0% 36.9% 68.6% 30.8%
30 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1% 2013 10/10 11.2 3.5 59.1% 73.6% 45.8% 58.0% 33.2% 62.3% 27.8%
31 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2% 2014 10/10 16.8 4.0 62.0% 76.4% 49.0% 49.3% 24.9% 66.4% 28.0%
32 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9% 2015 55/55 13.9 3.7 60.6% 79.6% 50.8% 69.0% 39.4% 68.4% 32.2%
33 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0% 2016 56/59 15.3 3.6 60.8% 82.1% 53.2% 61.4% 37.0% 70.6% 32.6%
34 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0% 2017 48/50 14.7 3.9 63.0% 80.1% 52.7% 70.9% 43.0% 69.6% 32.7%
35 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9% 2018 28/28 15.0 4.8 61.4% 78.3% 47.3% 58.5% 28.4% 66.2% 31.1%
36 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8% — 397/405 13.4 3.6 61.3% 77.9% 50.6% 63.2% 37.8% 67.3% 31.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Gilles Muller
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1488 100.0 -3.28 -2.21 0.908 49.0% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.06
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1451 96.0 +2.20 -4.69 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1600 126.5 +0.44 -0.24 1.013 50.1% +38 — — 44.2% -0.09 7–1 (88%) 1–6 (14%) 105.2 +0.52
22 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1728 137.8 +2.01 -3.76 0.888 48.6% -9 -178 -152 44.8% -0.60 6–5 (55%) 13–6 (68%) 107.5 -2.15
23 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1535 118.4 -0.34 -3.26 0.890 48.8% +78 -6 -43 36.1% -0.67 1–4 (20%) 5–9 (36%) 92.3 +1.32
24 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08 2007 1578 104.7 +1.65 -2.99 0.958 49.5% -32 — — 30.8% -0.77 — 1–1 — +0.07
25 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04 2008 1673 122.4 +2.48 -2.87 0.833 48.5% +20 — — 45.7% -0.34 2–2 (50%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 +0.16
26 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1632 120.3 +1.24 -3.51 0.868 48.1% +68 — -102 40.0% -0.63 1–2 (33%) 5–2 (71%) 101.7 +0.29
27 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2010 1610 114.3 -1.03 -2.96 0.979 49.2% — — — 50.0% -0.10 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.27
28 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07 2011 1798 145.1 +4.00 -3.93 0.931 49.6% 0 — -131 55.4% -0.09 2–5 (29%) 16–11 (59%) 101.5 -0.32
29 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 2012 1840 148.8 +4.06 -4.34 0.979 49.8% +31 -246 -188 46.8% -0.15 10–7 (59%) 16–17 (48%) 102.7 -1.66
30 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29 2013 1678 116.7 +0.08 -5.24 0.738 45.9% +82 -165 — 26.1% -1.22 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.20
31 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92 2014 1738 140.5 +1.86 -1.97 0.832 47.2% +17 — — 44.4% -0.71 1–2 (33%) 5–3 (63%) 101.0 -0.77
32 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70 2015 1894 162.5 +4.09 -2.33 1.019 50.8% -10 -311 -37 53.9% +0.26 11–8 (58%) 27–18 (60%) 107.4 -1.33
33 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18 2016 1968 159.7 +6.13 -2.52 1.108 51.4% -18 — -20 55.2% +0.31 10–8 (56%) 24–21 (53%) 101.5 -1.98
34 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05 2017 1943 156.0 +4.71 -2.01 1.074 51.2% -84 -284 +133 59.7% +0.47 9–4 (69%) 19–10 (66%) 107.2 -0.32
35 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90 2018 1689 131.0 +1.83 -3.86 0.921 48.7% +16 -65 +271 39.0% -0.55 3–6 (33%) 9–10 (47%) 92.5 +1.28
36 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10 — 2076 149.8 +3.16 -2.99 0.969 49.8% +3 -180 -5 48.3% -0.13 65–58 (53%) 152–124 (55%) 106.3 -1.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.