H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Juan Ignacio Chela H2H: 0-1
Juan Ignacio Chela holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Ignacio Chela leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Ignacio Chela won the 2010 Miami Masters first round 6-4 3-6 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 46
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2010* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Juan Ignacio Chela | 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Juan Ignacio Chela | #967 | #15 | 1,510 | 1,909 | 306 | 268 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Juan Ignacio Chela | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #63 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #23 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #38 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #33 | 1,721 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #20 | 1,796 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #140 | 1,737 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #73 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #38 | 1,835 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,737 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #176 | 1,634 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |