H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Paolo Lorenzi vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 2-0

Paolo Lorenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2017 Quito quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Paolo Lorenzi
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Rajeev Ram
USA Age 42 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Paolo Lorenzi #46 6-3 6-4 Rajeev Ram #137 Match data Feb 11, 2017* QF Quito ATP 250 Clay
Paolo Lorenzi #71 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 Rajeev Ram #98 Match data Oct 22, 2015* R32 Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Paolo Lorenzi #1,033 #33 1,223 1,823 105 181 36.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Rajeev Ram #1,076 #56 826 1,747 57 94 37.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Rajeev Ram
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2003 1–1 50.0% — 1,492 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2004 1–3 25.0% #297 1,474 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2005 2–2 50.0% #195 1,490 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 0–1 0.0% #197 1,457 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #253 1,417 0 0
24 2006 0–1 0.0% #168 1,503 0 0 2008 2–4 33.3% #190 1,478 0 0
25 2007 1–1 50.0% #294 1,492 0 0 2009 8–6 57.1% #79 1,587 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 2010 6–18 25.0% #184 1,591 0 1
27 2009 0–1 0.0% #84 1,437 0 0 2011 2–3 40.0% #149 1,606 0 1
28 2010 2–14 12.5% #143 1,435 0 0 2012 7–9 43.8% #132 1,636 0 1
29 2011 2–3 40.0% #108 1,516 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #127 1,646 0 1
30 2012 8–17 32.0% #64 1,604 0 0 2014 3–7 30.0% #139 1,660 0 1
31 2013 13–24 35.1% #109 1,646 0 0 2015 7–6 53.8% #89 1,654 0 2
32 2014 11–14 44.0% #64 1,663 0 0 2016 12–19 38.7% #129 1,616 0 2
33 2015 7–18 28.0% #68 1,615 0 0 2017 2–2 50.0% #353 1,582 0 2
34 2016 24–25 49.0% #40 1,793 0 1 — — — — — — —
35 2017 24–32 42.9% #43 1,700 0 1 — — — — — — —
36 2018 6–15 28.6% #109 1,632 0 1 — — — — — — —
37 2019 6–10 37.5% #115 1,628 0 1 — — — — — — —
38 2020 1–4 20.0% #146 1,536 0 1 — — — — — — —
39 2021 0–2 0.0% #274 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Rajeev Ram
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2012 4 8 12 33.3% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
30 2012 4 7 11 36.4% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2014 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 8 12 20 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
32 2014 3 4 7 42.9% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2016 9 11 20 45.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 2015 3 7 10 30.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2016 10 12 22 45.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 9 17 26 34.6% 14 12 26 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 3 4 7 42.9% 2 9 11 18.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 79 122 35.2% 57 81 138 41.3% 5 21 26 19.2% — 34 71 105 32.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 19 16 35 54.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 283/286 of Paolo Lorenzi's and 150/151 of Rajeev Ram's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Rajeev Ram
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 1/1 3.0 3.0 41.5% 55.6% 47.4% 60.0% 50.0% 50.8% 31.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 2/2 4.5 7.0 45.7% 78.9% 42.5% 55.0% 52.8% 59.1% 39.8%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/4 4.8 5.0 54.3% 75.1% 44.7% 56.9% 44.6% 61.5% 28.2%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 4/4 11.3 3.8 54.9% 75.5% 45.8% 56.4% 54.3% 62.1% 34.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 68.9% 74.5% 34.8% 0.0% 100.0% 62.2% 26.5%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 1/1 6.0 4.0 59.0% 71.4% 52.9% 55.6% 33.3% 63.9% 41.8%
24 2006 1/1 0.0 1.0 53.3% 42.5% 48.6% 41.7% 37.5% 45.3% 40.0% 2008 6/6 6.0 1.5 63.5% 69.6% 41.8% 45.8% 44.2% 59.3% 32.5%
25 2007 2/2 0.5 3.0 66.3% 62.4% 44.0% 46.4% 60.0% 55.5% 27.5% 2009 14/14 9.1 2.6 58.3% 77.3% 53.3% 73.2% 36.0% 67.3% 33.0%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 24/24 10.2 3.3 58.5% 71.2% 47.0% 42.4% 32.4% 61.1% 28.1%
27 2009 1/1 2.0 2.0 54.3% 64.0% 28.6% 33.3% — 47.8% 17.9% 2011 5/5 4.2 2.0 62.1% 70.2% 44.7% 44.7% 54.2% 61.1% 30.3%
28 2010 16/16 4.1 4.3 61.0% 64.7% 44.6% 56.6% 27.2% 56.9% 33.2% 2012 16/16 5.1 2.5 58.3% 74.9% 48.0% 58.8% 40.8% 63.4% 33.3%
29 2011 5/5 1.8 2.8 65.2% 66.1% 42.6% 51.9% 38.0% 57.9% 36.6% 2013 15/15 7.4 2.6 61.6% 69.7% 46.1% 58.8% 39.6% 60.8% 33.6%
30 2012 25/25 2.6 2.0 61.5% 63.8% 48.2% 50.5% 34.3% 57.8% 34.1% 2014 10/10 6.1 2.8 62.0% 70.2% 48.9% 62.0% 32.6% 62.2% 31.9%
31 2013 37/37 2.9 2.3 57.2% 67.7% 49.8% 52.7% 36.3% 60.1% 36.2% 2015 13/13 9.8 2.4 63.0% 75.6% 53.0% 65.0% 44.1% 67.1% 31.1%
32 2014 25/25 3.8 2.1 57.6% 70.1% 48.9% 60.1% 48.5% 61.1% 39.9% 2016 30/31 7.2 3.0 63.5% 72.6% 50.5% 60.9% 35.2% 64.4% 33.3%
33 2015 25/25 4.2 2.6 56.5% 66.9% 49.3% 51.8% 40.9% 58.6% 31.0% 2017 4/4 6.8 4.3 55.8% 74.6% 53.0% 69.8% 22.4% 65.2% 32.7%
34 2016 47/49 4.0 2.6 56.3% 69.0% 48.1% 55.5% 43.8% 60.0% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 55/56 4.5 2.8 58.5% 69.4% 52.7% 56.4% 38.4% 62.3% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 21/21 5.4 3.4 57.6% 71.0% 45.0% 61.9% 37.0% 59.9% 33.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 16/16 5.0 3.3 60.6% 71.1% 51.4% 67.4% 45.2% 63.4% 30.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 5/5 2.8 3.0 56.9% 67.8% 43.1% 48.1% 24.2% 57.0% 33.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 2/2 2.5 2.5 61.3% 61.1% 32.2% 58.3% 50.0% 49.3% 25.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 283/286 3.9 2.7 58.3% 68.1% 48.8% 55.8% 39.3% 60.0% 34.8% — 150/151 7.6 2.9 60.2% 72.8% 48.6% 57.4% 38.6% 63.1% 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Paolo Lorenzi Rajeev Ram
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 99.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1479 99.7 +2.35 +0.19 0.641 41.8% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.13
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1493 105.3 -0.85 +0.13 0.972 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.02
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1474 102.9 -3.28 -0.64 0.731 44.5% +28 — — 27.3% -1.55 1–0 1–1 — +0.23
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1490 105.6 -0.27 -2.37 0.916 49.5% +13 — — 54.5% 0.00 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.22
22 2004 1488 98.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1458 100.0 +0.64 -0.34 0.700 45.1% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
23 2005 1469 94.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1418 101.5 -4.12 -2.14 1.157 51.3% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 — — +0.10
24 2006 1504 104.3 +3.27 -1.79 0.732 42.8% — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — -0.08 2008 1479 114.5 -1.05 -1.49 0.798 46.4% +22 — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
25 2007 1493 97.8 -0.64 -3.08 0.618 43.5% — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 1–1 — -0.04 2009 1587 122.4 +1.13 -1.70 1.010 50.2% -72 — +148 52.8% +0.11 3–1 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 99.9 +0.97
26 2008 1459 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1592 116.0 -1.64 -5.51 0.722 44.9% -24 — +108 33.3% -1.42 3–6 (33%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +0.56
27 2009 1438 104.3 -4.82 +0.04 0.344 34.1% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06 2011 1606 115.8 -0.85 -2.60 0.778 45.9% +3 — — 50.0% -0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.01
28 2010 1435 112.9 -3.79 -3.23 0.770 45.2% +6 +72 +28 20.0% -1.85 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 -0.07 2012 1636 116.2 -0.05 -3.04 0.910 48.7% -41 — +70 46.9% -0.37 0–1 4–3 (57%) — +1.50
29 2011 1517 125.6 -0.71 +1.76 0.870 47.1% -1 — — 45.5% -1.00 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31 2013 1647 124.3 -1.42 -2.56 0.856 47.5% -6 — +7 40.0% -0.65 0–5 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.29
30 2012 1604 133.1 -3.58 -1.74 0.808 45.7% -7 -40 -150 33.9% -1.24 5–4 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 101.5 -0.29 2014 1661 116.5 -1.88 -1.96 0.844 47.1% 0 — — 30.4% -1.13 2–1 (67%) 0–3 (0%) 98.4 +0.65
31 2013 1647 139.6 -1.95 -1.10 0.906 48.1% -26 -59 -191 36.5% -0.84 2–5 (29%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -0.92 2015 1654 122.8 +0.37 -2.07 0.944 49.7% -77 — +184 52.8% -0.14 4–3 (57%) 8–3 (73%) 104.7 +0.64
32 2014 1664 133.8 -1.37 +1.94 1.025 50.4% -26 +44 -207 42.1% -0.40 2–6 (25%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 +0.70 2016 1617 133.1 -0.28 -2.91 0.934 49.1% +29 -87 +110 40.3% -0.65 3–4 (43%) 12–5 (71%) 105.8 +0.66
33 2015 1615 126.4 -3.80 -3.71 0.748 45.0% +9 +14 — 31.7% -0.88 5–2 (71%) 2–8 (20%) 98.7 +0.18 2017 1583 110.5 +0.38 -1.49 0.939 48.0% — -27 — 44.4% -0.78 1–0 2–0 — +0.44
34 2016 1793 148.1 -2.03 -0.06 0.925 48.8% -53 -16 -398 46.8% -0.22 11–6 (65%) 10–11 (48%) 108.4 +1.05 2018 1563 95.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2017 1701 139.0 -1.35 -1.16 0.925 48.8% -33 +63 -290 45.9% -0.32 8–11 (42%) 15–16 (48%) 96.7 +2.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2018 1632 123.3 -2.86 -2.73 0.824 47.1% +52 -8 -190 35.7% -0.70 0–4 (0%) 5–7 (42%) 94.8 +0.77 2020 1551 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2019 1629 124.6 -0.47 -3.08 0.836 47.5% +77 -70 — 37.0% -0.67 5–3 (63%) 7–10 (41%) 101.2 +1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2020 1537 109.2 -1.98 -0.85 0.778 45.2% +108 — — 16.7% -1.67 1–0 0–1 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2021 1494 93.1 -2.75 -1.01 0.505 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1824 134.2 -2.16 -1.27 0.869 47.5% -9 +4 -201 38.6% -0.71 41–46 (47%) 51–71 (42%) 98.6 +2.10 — 1748 123.1 -0.63 -2.79 0.869 47.8% -13 -67 +107 41.7% -0.67 18–26 (41%) 44–31 (59%) 104.5 +4.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.