H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Rajeev Ram H2H: 2-0
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 2–0 lead over Rajeev Ram in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2017 Quito quarterfinal 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 42
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2017* | Quito | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-3 6-4 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
| Oct 22, 2015* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-7(4) 6-1 6-4 | Rajeev Ram | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rajeev Ram | #1,076 | #56 | 826 | 1,747 | 57 | 94 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Rajeev Ram | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #536 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #437 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #297 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #195 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #190 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #79 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #149 | 1,605 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #132 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #127 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #139 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #89 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #129 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #353 | 1,582 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |