H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Steve Darcis H2H: 1-0
Paolo Lorenzi holds a 1–0 lead over Steve Darcis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Lorenzi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paolo Lorenzi won the 2015 Metz third round 1-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2015* | Metz | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Q2 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Steve Darcis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Steve Darcis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |