H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Paolo Lorenzi vs Vasek Pospisil H2H: 1-2
Vasek Pospisil holds a 2–1 lead over Paolo Lorenzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Vasek Pospisil leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Vasek Pospisil won the 2015 Australian Open second round 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 36
Right-Handed
194 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2015* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Vasek Pospisil | 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 6-4 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2014* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Vasek Pospisil | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Paolo Lorenzi | Match data |
| Oct 19, 2012* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Paolo Lorenzi | 6-4 6-4 | Vasek Pospisil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paolo Lorenzi | #1,033 | #33 | 1,223 | 1,823 | 104 | 180 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Vasek Pospisil | #1,265 | #25 | 1,359 | 1,958 | 122 | 161 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paolo Lorenzi | Vasek Pospisil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #119 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #53 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #294 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #84 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #108 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2010 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #143 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2011 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #108 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2012 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #64 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #61 | 1,926 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2013 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #109 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,761 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2014 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #98 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2015 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #68 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2016 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,781 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #733 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2017 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1265 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | 2018 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #109 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2019 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #146 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #274 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |