H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Paradorn Srichaphan vs Danai Udomchoke H2H: 1-0
Paradorn Srichaphan holds a 1–0 lead over Danai Udomchoke in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paradorn Srichaphan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 2006 Nottingham third round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
THA
Age 44
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2006* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-3 7-6(4) | Danai Udomchoke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Danai Udomchoke | #1,207 | #77 | 646 | 1,631 | 18 | 52 | 25.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paradorn Srichaphan | Danai Udomchoke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #283 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #204 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #104 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #154 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #457 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #210 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |