H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Paradorn Srichaphan vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-0
Paradorn Srichaphan holds a 1–0 lead over Guillaume Raoux in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paradorn Srichaphan leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Paradorn Srichaphan won the 1999 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-4 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
THA
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Paradorn Srichaphan | 6-2 6-4 7-6(7) | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paradorn Srichaphan | #1,149 | #9 | 1,925 | 1,997 | 219 | 182 | 54.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Paradorn Srichaphan | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #460 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #99 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #120 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #11 | 1,823 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 42–28 | 60.0% | #27 | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 31–29 | 51.7% | #42 | 1,794 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 28–31 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #628 | 1,636 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |