H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Pat Cash vs Cassio Motta H2H: 2-0
Pat Cash holds a 2–0 lead over Cassio Motta in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pat Cash leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1984 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 66
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1984* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-3 6-3 | Cassio Motta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Cassio Motta | #576 | #48 | 352 | 1,740 | 105 | 164 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Cassio Motta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #255 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1982 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1983 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1984 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #107 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #49 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #122 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #74 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #134 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1990 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #105 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #216 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | 1992 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #198 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #693 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |