H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Pat Cash vs Danie Visser H2H: 0-1

Danie Visser holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danie Visser leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Danie Visser won the 1984 Queen's Club Championships round of 16 7-6 5-7 6-4.

AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
RSA Age 65 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Danie Visser 7-6 5-7 6-4 Pat Cash #35 Match data Jun 15, 1984* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Danie Visser #749 #59 191 1,709 92 129 41.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cash Danie Visser
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 2–5 28.6% 1,497 0 0
17 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,698 0 1
18 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,830 0 2
19 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,906 0 2 1981 1–2 33.3% 1,506 0 0
20 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,834 0 2 1982 7–18 28.0% #93 1,483 0 0
21 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,879 0 2 1983 7–12 36.8% #138 1,495 0 0
22 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5 1984 13–14 48.1% #72 1,618 0 0
23 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,950 1 5 1985 13–20 39.4% #145 1,642 0 0
24 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5 1986 15–14 51.7% #83 1,676 0 0
25 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,873 1 6 1987 11–16 40.7% #136 1,635 0 0
26 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,807 1 6 1988 9–13 40.9% #143 1,591 0 0
27 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,819 1 6 1989 10–13 43.5% #141 1,621 0 0
28 1990 5–5 50.0% #197 1,652 0 0
29 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,768 1 6 1991 1–2 33.3% #405 1,642 0 0
30 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,679 1 6
31 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,620 1 6
32 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,575 1 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pat Cash Danie Visser
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
17 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 0 5 100.0%
19 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1982 3 7 10 30.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 10 7 17 58.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1984 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 1988 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 4 2 6 66.7% 1986 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
28 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 74 52 126 58.7% 12 20 32 37.5% 80 34 114 70.2% 44 28 72 61.1% 51 67 118 43.2% 4 15 19 21.1% 31 36 67 46.3% 6 11 17 35.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 54/60 of Pat Cash's and 3/3 of Danie Visser's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pat Cash Danie Visser
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 22/25 4.9 3.0 59.7% 71.2% 52.4% 64.0% 49.5% 63.4% 37.4% —/—
27 1992 8/9 6.1 2.8 62.6% 73.4% 54.8% 65.7% 42.7% 66.9% 39.0% —/—
29 1994 2/2 5.5 5.0 48.7% 63.5% 48.7% 51.7% 39.3% 56.0% 34.8% 1991 3/3 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%
30 1995 10/12 6.6 3.7 55.6% 76.0% 39.7% 52.4% 38.9% 59.5% 32.3% —/—
31 1996 3/3 5.3 3.7 59.8% 61.4% 43.2% 35.2% 11.1% 54.0% 24.8% —/—
32 1997 9/9 6.8 6.4 51.3% 75.6% 40.5% 52.5% 21.8% 57.9% 31.7% —/—
Career 54/344 5.8 3.8 57.6% 72.3% 47.8% 58.1% 39.4% 61.5% 34.9% 3/221 7.3 1.3 63.8% 64.9% 49.3% 70.2% 8.3% 59.1% 26.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pat Cash Danie Visser
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1497 113.9 +35 31.3% -1.50 0–1 2–0 +0.24
17 1982 1698 132.0 -112 +54 57.4% +0.56 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 +2.72
18 1983 1830 138.2 -113 -305 +47 57.8% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.9 +1.41
19 1984 1906 144.1 -85 -352 +98 60.5% +0.71 8–6 (57%) 12–12 (50%) 102.0 +0.05 1981 1507 107.7 +43 50.0% -0.63 0–2 2–0 +0.01
20 1985 1834 136.3 -32 +150 59.2% +0.84 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 96.5 +0.66 1982 1483 114.0 +43 -13 +61 39.7% -0.84 1–9 (10%) 9–7 (56%) 95.2 +1.20
21 1986 1879 151.2 -30 +160 58.3% +0.72 5–4 (56%) 4–8 (33%) 96.9 -1.75 1983 1496 111.4 +39 -38 42.3% -0.17 3–5 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 100.5 +1.59
22 1987 2023 157.7 -58 -499 +222 67.3% +1.03 9–5 (64%) 18–13 (58%) 105.0 -3.31 1984 1618 134.7 -27 -150 +4 50.0% -0.04 7–7 (50%) 5–8 (38%) 101.4 -0.82
23 1988 1950 151.7 +5 -347 +195 66.7% +1.50 6–2 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +0.37 1985 1643 120.9 -82 +8 42.9% -0.37 4–6 (40%) 7–11 (39%) 97.0 +0.53
24 1989 1927 118.1 -1 64.7% +0.94 2–0 2–1 (67%) +0.10 1986 1676 124.7 -64 +38 51.4% -0.11 4–5 (44%) 6–7 (46%) 101.0 +0.55
25 1990 1874 140.0 +4 +236 57.7% +0.63 8–4 (67%) 8–10 (44%) 97.4 -0.75 1987 1635 124.7 -10 +22 43.4% -0.35 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 102.4 -1.15
26 1991 1807 141.6 +2.17 -0.28 1.021 50.7% +66 -205 +265 58.2% +0.30 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.8 -1.86 1988 1591 112.9 -2 +38 41.4% -0.38 4–3 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 99.9 +1.16
27 1992 1819 136.1 +2.39 +1.48 1.179 52.8% +11 +259 64.3% +0.36 0–4 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 97.9 -1.59 1989 1621 129.7 -23 +15 44.4% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 7–4 (64%) 102.8 -0.79
28 1990 1652 113.0 -22 -22 51.9% -0.11 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.2 -0.54
29 1994 1769 98.9 -1.13 +1.33 0.791 45.3% 33.3% -1.84 0–2 +0.19 1991 1643 108.2 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -23 37.5% -1.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) +0.02
30 1995 1680 117.3 -1.30 -1.24 0.799 46.1% +77 41.4% -1.03 4–1 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 103.5 -0.32
31 1996 1620 100.5 -2.77 -3.64 0.540 40.4% 0.0% -2.86 0–1 +0.11
32 1997 1576 115.0 -0.83 -2.98 0.752 45.6% +79 30.4% -1.43 0–2 3–1 (75%) -0.44
Career 2098 151.6 +0.66 -0.77 0.907 48.5% -24 -330 +136 58.8% +0.60 64–50 (56%) 90–77 (54%) 101.4 -1.21 1710 127.9 -0.83 -4.21 0.649 43.6% -19 -50 +21 44.9% -0.31 33–48 (41%) 58–58 (50%) 100.6 +0.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.