H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Pat Cash vs Gilad Bloom H2H: 1-0
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Gilad Bloom in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1990 Seoul semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 59
Left-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 1990* | Seoul | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Pat Cash | 6-3 6-3 | Gilad Bloom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Gilad Bloom | #1,295 | #61 | 524 | 1,750 | 82 | 103 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Gilad Bloom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #385 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #452 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #152 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #139 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #210 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1989 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #105 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1990 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1991 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #125 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #137 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1993 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #217 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #407 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |