H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pat Cash vs Jeff Simpson H2H: 1-0
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Simpson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1982 Adelaide fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 1982* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-4 6-4 | Jeff Simpson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Jeff Simpson | #735 | #66 | 0 | 1,598 | 47 | 94 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Jeff Simpson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 8–16 | 33.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1973 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #92 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1974 | 12–30 | 28.6% | #132 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1975 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #193 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #365 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #96 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #167 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |