H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Pat Cash vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 1-3

Jimmy Arias holds a 3–1 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Arias leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1986 Hong Kong Open round of 32 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pat Cash
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pat Cash #54 6-4 3-6 6-3 Jimmy Arias #45 Match data Oct 30, 1986* R32 Hong Kong Open ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Arias #30 1-6 6-3 7-6 Pat Cash #9 Match data May 2, 1985* R32 Las Vegas ATP 250 Hard
Jimmy Arias #12 6-7 7-6 6-1 6-1 Pat Cash #54 Match data May 25, 1983* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jimmy Arias #20 6-4 6-1 Pat Cash #55 Match data May 13, 1983* R16 Florence ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,061 281 217 56.4% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cash Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,531 0 0
16 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,497 0 0 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,698 0 1 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,830 0 2 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,039 0 5
19 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,906 0 2 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,878 0 5
20 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,834 0 2 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,811 0 5
21 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,879 0 2 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,950 1 5 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,695 0 5
25 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,873 1 6 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,807 1 6 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,692 0 5
27 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,819 1 6 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 — — — — — — — 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,768 1 6 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,639 0 5
30 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,679 1 6 — — — — — — —
31 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,620 1 6 — — — — — — —
32 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,575 1 6 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,641 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pat Cash Jimmy Arias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1982 3 4 7 42.9% 22 9 31 71.0% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 0 5 100.0% 1983 8 2 10 80.0% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
19 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1984 9 6 15 60.0% 17 8 25 68.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
20 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 24 9 33 72.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
21 1986 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1986 8 11 19 42.1% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1987 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 1 7 8 12.5% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 14 13 27 51.9% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9%
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 1992 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 74 52 126 58.7% 12 20 32 37.5% 80 34 114 70.2% 44 28 72 61.1% — 120 100 220 54.5% 142 88 230 61.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 16 26 42 38.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 54/60 of Pat Cash's and 63/72 of Jimmy Arias's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pat Cash Jimmy Arias
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 22/25 4.9 3.0 59.7% 71.2% 52.4% 64.0% 49.5% 63.4% 37.4% 1991 39/42 1.8 2.8 69.8% 62.0% 49.5% 56.5% 42.3% 58.2% 41.0%
27 1992 8/9 6.1 2.8 62.6% 73.4% 54.8% 65.7% 42.7% 66.9% 39.0% 1992 8/12 2.1 2.4 70.1% 61.2% 48.1% 53.6% 48.5% 57.0% 35.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 9/9 1.4 3.6 69.5% 66.8% 47.3% 51.6% 38.0% 60.7% 38.2%
29 1994 2/2 5.5 5.0 48.7% 63.5% 48.7% 51.7% 39.3% 56.0% 34.8% 1994 5/7 2.6 2.6 62.9% 65.2% 48.9% 58.4% 41.0% 58.4% 34.6%
30 1995 10/12 6.6 3.7 55.6% 76.0% 39.7% 52.4% 38.9% 59.5% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 3/3 5.3 3.7 59.8% 61.4% 43.2% 35.2% 11.1% 54.0% 24.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 9/9 6.8 6.4 51.3% 75.6% 40.5% 52.5% 21.8% 57.9% 31.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 2/2 1.0 3.5 59.3% 61.1% 46.7% 55.0% 50.0% 55.4% 32.1%
Career — 54/344 5.8 3.8 57.6% 72.3% 47.8% 58.1% 39.4% 61.5% 34.9% — 63/498 1.8 2.9 68.9% 62.8% 48.9% 55.6% 42.6% 58.3% 39.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pat Cash Jimmy Arias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1531 118.3 — — — — +61 — — 45.5% -0.23 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.9 +0.21
16 1981 1497 113.9 — — — — — — +35 31.3% -1.50 0–1 2–0 — +0.24 1981 1626 120.1 — — — — +15 -65 — 55.8% +0.09 2–3 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 101.1 +1.61
17 1982 1698 132.0 — — — — -112 — +54 57.4% +0.56 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 +2.72 1982 1858 146.3 — — — — -127 -26 — 62.1% +0.66 10–11 (48%) 10–7 (59%) 104.8 +1.99
18 1983 1830 138.2 — — — — -113 -305 +47 57.8% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.9 +1.41 1983 2040 155.5 — — — — -177 +21 — 65.4% +0.69 14–5 (74%) 16–9 (64%) 109.5 -0.41
19 1984 1906 144.1 — — — — -85 -352 +98 60.5% +0.71 8–6 (57%) 12–12 (50%) 102.0 +0.05 1984 1879 150.8 — — — — -5 +97 -247 58.1% +0.40 15–7 (68%) 17–7 (71%) 106.2 -2.32
20 1985 1834 136.3 — — — — -32 — +150 59.2% +0.84 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 96.5 +0.66 1985 1812 143.3 — — — — +55 +10 — 56.2% +0.36 14–11 (56%) 15–11 (58%) 100.9 +1.26
21 1986 1879 151.2 — — — — -30 — +160 58.3% +0.72 5–4 (56%) 4–8 (33%) 96.9 -1.75 1986 1669 139.2 — — — — +2 +190 — 50.0% -0.14 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.7 -0.60
22 1987 2023 157.7 — — — — -58 -499 +222 67.3% +1.03 9–5 (64%) 18–13 (58%) 105.0 -3.31 1987 1721 145.4 — — — — -8 +100 — 52.7% +0.26 7–7 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 99.0 -2.03
23 1988 1950 151.7 — — — — +5 -347 +195 66.7% +1.50 6–2 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +0.37 1988 1615 129.7 — — — — +8 +119 — 35.8% -0.34 3–3 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 96.2 -0.94
24 1989 1927 118.1 — — — — -1 — — 64.7% +0.94 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.10 1989 1696 146.3 — — — — -18 +50 — 52.9% +0.24 4–9 (31%) 8–5 (62%) 100.1 -2.89
25 1990 1874 140.0 — — — — +4 — +236 57.7% +0.63 8–4 (67%) 8–10 (44%) 97.4 -0.75 1990 1681 136.8 — — — — -3 +36 — 46.7% -0.13 8–8 (50%) 7–11 (39%) 95.7 -1.09
26 1991 1807 141.6 +2.17 -0.28 1.021 50.7% +66 -205 +265 58.2% +0.30 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.8 -1.86 1991 1693 129.8 -2.05 +1.95 0.980 49.6% +10 +39 — 50.9% -0.16 8–4 (67%) 11–6 (65%) 107.1 +0.40
27 1992 1819 136.1 +2.39 +1.48 1.179 52.8% +11 — +259 64.3% +0.36 0–4 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 97.9 -1.59 1992 1645 115.7 -2.91 -0.85 0.820 46.5% +25 — — 35.5% -1.00 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.9 -0.26
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1664 121.0 -0.94 -1.03 0.971 49.6% +45 -7 — 52.4% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 2–0 — +0.34
29 1994 1769 98.9 -1.13 +1.33 0.791 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — +0.19 1994 1639 110.6 +0.21 -2.37 0.831 46.2% +51 -6 — 43.8% -0.06 1–1 0–2 — +0.36
30 1995 1680 117.3 -1.30 -1.24 0.799 46.1% +77 — — 41.4% -1.03 4–1 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 103.5 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1620 100.5 -2.77 -3.64 0.540 40.4% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1576 115.0 -0.83 -2.98 0.752 45.6% +79 — — 30.4% -1.43 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1641 103.3 -1.51 -0.94 0.721 43.7% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.03
Career — 2098 151.6 +0.66 -0.77 0.907 48.5% -24 -330 +136 58.8% +0.60 64–50 (56%) 90–77 (54%) 101.4 -1.21 — 2061 148.5 -1.80 +0.73 0.937 48.8% -6 +47 -247 53.9% +0.19 96–84 (53%) 108–83 (57%) 104.3 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.