H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Pat Cash vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-4

Jimmy Connors holds a 4–1 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Jimmy Connors won the 1988 Montreal / Toronto quarterfinal 7-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pat Cash
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 14, 1988* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 QF Hard Jimmy Connors #6 7-6 7-6 Pat Cash #8 Match data
Jul 5, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Pat Cash #11 6-4 6-4 6-1 Jimmy Connors #7 Match data
Jun 13, 1987* Queen's Club ATP 250 SF Grass Jimmy Connors #7 7-6 6-4 Pat Cash #13 Match data
Aug 18, 1984* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #3 6-3 6-3 Pat Cash #15 Match data
Aug 11, 1982* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jimmy Connors #2 7-5 6-4 Pat Cash #342 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cash Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,496 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,697 0 1 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,829 0 2 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,905 0 2 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,833 0 2 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,878 0 2 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,949 1 5 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,872 1 6 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,806 1 6 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,817 1 6 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 — — — — — — — 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,767 1 6 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,677 1 6 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,616 1 6 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,574 1 6 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109