H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pat Cash vs Joakim Nystrom H2H: 1-2
Joakim Nystrom holds a 2–1 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Joakim Nystrom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Joakim Nystrom won the 1985 Rotterdam quarterfinal 2-6 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 63
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Joakim Nystrom | 2-6 6-3 7-6 | Pat Cash | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1985* | Brussels | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Pat Cash | 6-4 6-2 | Joakim Nystrom | Match data |
| Dec 17, 1983* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Joakim Nystrom | 6-4 4-6 6-4 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Joakim Nystrom | #977 | #7 | 54 | 2,114 | 257 | 136 | 65.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Joakim Nystrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #69 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #98 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 26–12 | 68.4% | #27 | 1,868 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 56–20 | 73.7% | #11 | 1,967 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1985 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,925 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1986 | 55–17 | 76.4% | #7 | 1,912 | 0 | 12 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #16 | 1,876 | 0 | 13 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #69 | 1,729 | 0 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #331 | 1,607 | 0 | 13 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |