H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Pat Cash vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 3-1
Pat Cash holds a 3–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Pat Cash leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1990 Sydney Indoor second round 6-7 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 65
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1990* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Pat Cash | 6-7 7-6 6-2 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Jun 26, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1987* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | John Fitzgerald | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1983* | Sydney Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | John Fitzgerald | 6-2 7-6 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| John Fitzgerald | #765 | #25 | 321 | 1,857 | 230 | 221 | 51.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | John Fitzgerald | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #305 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #60 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,696 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1983 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #43 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #37 | 1,786 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1985 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #91 | 1,665 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #102 | 1,654 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,679 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #25 | 1,778 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #117 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,587 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1991 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #205 | 1,610 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | 1992 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #166 | 1,618 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | 1993 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #298 | 1,582 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #792 | 1,575 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |