H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Pat Cash vs Kim Warwick H2H: 2-0
Pat Cash holds a 2–0 lead over Kim Warwick in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pat Cash leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1985 Rotterdam third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 74
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pat Cash | 6-1 7-5 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1984* | Melbourne Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Pat Cash | 6-4 5-7 6-1 | Kim Warwick | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Kim Warwick | #1,294 | #15 | 15 | 1,945 | 290 | 273 | 51.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Kim Warwick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #108 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1974 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #48 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1975 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1976 | 28–32 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1977 | 35–29 | 54.7% | #50 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #41 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1979 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #52 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,926 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1981 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #29 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1982 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #196 | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #497 | 1,664 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #600 | 1,652 | 0 | 3 |