H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Pat Cash vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1
Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Newport third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 1996* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Leander Paes | 6-2 6-2 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |