H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Pat Cash vs Leander Paes H2H: 0-1

Leander Paes holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leander Paes leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leander Paes won the 1996 Newport round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pat Cash
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Leander Paes
IND Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leander Paes #145 6-2 6-2 Pat Cash #1244 Match data Jul 11, 1996* R32 Newport World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Leander Paes #1,102 #73 611 1,737 53 77 40.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cash Leander Paes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,497 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,698 0 1 — — — — — — —
18 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,830 0 2 1991 1–2 33.3% #278 1,492 0 0
19 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,906 0 2 1992 0–1 0.0% #194 1,486 0 0
20 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,834 0 2 1993 1–3 25.0% #260 1,483 0 0
21 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,879 0 2 1994 2–3 40.0% #139 1,495 0 0
22 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5 1995 3–9 25.0% #130 1,486 0 0
23 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,950 1 5 1996 13–11 54.2% #129 1,654 0 0
24 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5 1997 13–18 41.9% #122 1,634 0 0
25 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,873 1 6 1998 13–10 56.5% #91 1,659 0 1
26 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,807 1 6 1999 3–9 25.0% #142 1,562 0 1
27 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,819 1 6 2000 3–6 33.3% #188 1,537 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2001 1–2 33.3% #299 1,595 0 1
29 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,768 1 6 2002 0–1 0.0% #998 1,579 0 1
30 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,679 1 6 2003 0–1 0.0% #1032 1,571 0 1
31 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,620 1 6 — — — — — — —
32 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,575 1 6 2005 0–1 0.0% #1102 1,550 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pat Cash Leander Paes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1981 — — — — — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 5 0 5 100.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 7 5 12 58.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1987 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 5 15 66.7% 1995 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
23 1988 12 4 16 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 11 15 26.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1990 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1991 5 2 7 71.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1999 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 1992 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2000 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
29 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 74 52 126 58.7% 12 20 32 37.5% 80 34 114 70.2% 44 28 72 61.1% — 25 50 75 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 18 13 31 58.1% 9 10 19 47.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 54/60 of Pat Cash's and 106/129 of Leander Paes's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Pat Cash Leander Paes
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 3/3 3.0 3.7 58.6% 71.0% 47.9% 77.5% 23.3% 61.5% 35.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 4/4 3.0 4.8 66.2% 67.5% 51.2% 45.8% 42.6% 61.8% 38.1%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 4/5 3.0 4.0 58.1% 73.3% 37.5% 40.8% 32.0% 58.1% 38.2%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 11/12 2.9 3.8 61.2% 64.3% 45.8% 55.8% 32.3% 57.2% 32.9%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 16/24 4.2 3.7 61.2% 68.8% 47.3% 55.1% 40.0% 60.6% 38.4%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 25/31 3.6 3.8 61.6% 74.3% 49.6% 58.7% 39.3% 64.9% 36.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 20/23 4.1 2.9 58.7% 71.2% 53.2% 70.8% 45.8% 63.8% 38.1%
26 1991 22/25 4.9 3.0 59.7% 71.2% 52.4% 64.0% 49.5% 63.4% 37.4% 1999 10/12 3.4 4.4 56.2% 71.4% 50.7% 61.7% 31.5% 62.2% 33.4%
27 1992 8/9 6.1 2.8 62.6% 73.4% 54.8% 65.7% 42.7% 66.9% 39.0% 2000 7/9 4.0 4.3 61.1% 65.9% 46.3% 44.5% 26.8% 58.0% 29.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2001 3/3 8.7 7.3 58.3% 70.9% 42.7% 53.6% 31.8% 59.1% 30.1%
29 1994 2/2 5.5 5.0 48.7% 63.5% 48.7% 51.7% 39.3% 56.0% 34.8% 2002 1/1 5.0 1.0 55.0% 54.5% 55.6% 20.0% — 55.0% 28.3%
30 1995 10/12 6.6 3.7 55.6% 76.0% 39.7% 52.4% 38.9% 59.5% 32.3% 2003 1/1 0.0 8.0 58.4% 61.0% 50.0% 66.7% 42.9% 56.4% 37.6%
31 1996 3/3 5.3 3.7 59.8% 61.4% 43.2% 35.2% 11.1% 54.0% 24.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 9/9 6.8 6.4 51.3% 75.6% 40.5% 52.5% 21.8% 57.9% 31.7% 2005 1/1 2.0 0.0 60.0% 66.7% 41.7% 42.9% 66.7% 56.7% 27.6%
Career — 54/344 5.8 3.8 57.6% 72.3% 47.8% 58.1% 39.4% 61.5% 34.9% — 106/130 3.8 3.8 60.2% 70.2% 48.7% 58.3% 37.5% 61.7% 35.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pat Cash Leander Paes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1981 1497 113.9 — — — — — — +35 31.3% -1.50 0–1 2–0 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1698 132.0 — — — — -112 — +54 57.4% +0.56 7–3 (70%) 8–4 (67%) 106.4 +2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1830 138.2 — — — — -113 -305 +47 57.8% +0.59 8–6 (57%) 7–10 (41%) 100.9 +1.41 1991 1493 103.0 -1.66 +0.58 0.932 49.1% +36 — — 28.6% -0.43 1–0 0–1 — +0.26
19 1984 1906 144.1 — — — — -85 -352 +98 60.5% +0.71 8–6 (57%) 12–12 (50%) 102.0 +0.05 1992 1486 102.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1985 1834 136.3 — — — — -32 — +150 59.2% +0.84 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 96.5 +0.66 1993 1483 104.5 -0.63 +0.03 0.998 49.6% +25 — — 36.4% -0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.15
21 1986 1879 151.2 — — — — -30 — +160 58.3% +0.72 5–4 (56%) 4–8 (33%) 96.9 -1.75 1994 1496 104.2 -1.44 -1.83 0.912 47.8% +3 — — 41.7% -0.92 0–1 2–0 — +0.34
22 1987 2023 157.7 — — — — -58 -499 +222 67.3% +1.03 9–5 (64%) 18–13 (58%) 105.0 -3.31 1995 1486 109.8 -2.61 -2.49 0.768 45.6% +14 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 99.3 +0.09
23 1988 1950 151.7 — — — — +5 -347 +195 66.7% +1.50 6–2 (75%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +0.37 1996 1655 129.5 -1.01 -0.14 0.975 49.4% -32 — -11 50.0% -0.11 4–1 (80%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.13
24 1989 1927 118.1 — — — — -1 — — 64.7% +0.94 2–0 2–1 (67%) — +0.10 1997 1634 115.9 +1.36 -1.27 1.044 50.5% -37 -94 +43 43.0% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 96.3 +1.81
25 1990 1874 140.0 — — — — +4 — +236 57.7% +0.63 8–4 (67%) 8–10 (44%) 97.4 -0.75 1998 1660 131.9 +0.72 +0.24 1.053 51.4% -30 — +69 51.0% +0.26 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +1.30
26 1991 1807 141.6 +2.17 -0.28 1.021 50.7% +66 -205 +265 58.2% +0.30 3–5 (38%) 7–2 (78%) 99.8 -1.86 1999 1562 108.9 -1.02 -2.19 0.884 47.9% -19 — +132 25.0% -1.18 1–1 1–4 (20%) — +0.75
27 1992 1819 136.1 +2.39 +1.48 1.179 52.8% +11 — +259 64.3% +0.36 0–4 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 97.9 -1.59 2000 1538 104.1 -1.46 -3.99 0.711 44.3% +15 — — 36.4% -1.23 0–1 3–1 (75%) — +0.88
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1596 106.9 -0.83 -2.86 0.736 45.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 — 0–1 — +0.48
29 1994 1769 98.9 -1.13 +1.33 0.791 45.3% — — — 33.3% -1.84 0–2 — — +0.19 2002 1579 97.0 -2.95 -4.40 0.628 40.7% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.12
30 1995 1680 117.3 -1.30 -1.24 0.799 46.1% +77 — — 41.4% -1.03 4–1 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 103.5 -0.32 2003 1572 104.5 +2.28 -1.66 0.864 47.8% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16
31 1996 1620 100.5 -2.77 -3.64 0.540 40.4% — — — 0.0% -2.86 — 0–1 — +0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1576 115.0 -0.83 -2.98 0.752 45.6% +79 — — 30.4% -1.43 0–2 3–1 (75%) — -0.44 2005 1551 95.8 -1.30 -1.39 0.637 42.4% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — +0.29
Career — 2098 151.6 +0.66 -0.77 0.907 48.5% -24 -330 +136 58.8% +0.60 64–50 (56%) 90–77 (54%) 101.4 -1.21 — 1738 121.9 -0.33 -1.21 0.934 48.8% -15 -94 +47 40.3% -0.54 14–15 (48%) 20–31 (39%) 96.9 +4.92

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.