H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Pat Cash vs Mats Wilander H2H: 5-3

Pat Cash holds a 5–3 lead over Mats Wilander in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Pat Cash leads 3–0 on grass and 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1990 New Haven second round 1-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Pat Cash
AUS Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 – 3
8 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 15, 1990* New Haven ATP 250 R64 Hard Pat Cash #112 1-6 7-5 6-3 Mats Wilander #40 Match data
Jan 25, 1988* Australian Open Grand Slam F Hard Mats Wilander #3 6-3 6-7 3-6 6-1 8-6 Pat Cash #7 Match data
Dec 2, 1987 Masters ATP Finals RR Carpet Mats Wilander #3 7-6 6-3 Pat Cash #7 Match data
Jul 3, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Pat Cash #11 6-3 7-5 6-4 Mats Wilander #3 Match data
Jul 2, 1986* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Pat Cash #413 4-6 7-5 6-4 6-3 Mats Wilander #2 Match data
Mar 16, 1985* Brussels ATP 250 SF Carpet Mats Wilander #4 6-3 7-6 Pat Cash #9 Match data
Sep 8, 1984* US Open Grand Slam QF Hard Pat Cash #18 7-6 6-4 2-6 6-3 Mats Wilander #4 Match data
Jun 29, 1984* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Pat Cash #33 6-7 6-4 6-2 6-4 Mats Wilander #4 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Pat Cash #734 #4 658 2,098 210 134 61.0% 1 0 0 0 5 6
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cash Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,496 0 0 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1982 17–10 63.0% #63 1,697 0 1 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1983 26–17 60.5% #34 1,829 0 2 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1984 26–15 63.4% #10 1,905 0 2 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1985 11–7 61.1% #67 1,833 0 2 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1986 16–10 61.5% #24 1,878 0 2 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1987 41–15 73.2% #7 2,022 1 5 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1988 23–9 71.9% #20 1,949 1 5 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1989 4–2 66.7% #368 1,927 1 5 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1990 18–10 64.3% #81 1,872 1 6 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1991 14–11 56.0% #108 1,806 1 6 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1992 5–4 55.6% #203 1,817 1 6 — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1994 0–2 0.0% #511 1,767 1 6 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1995 5–7 41.7% #250 1,677 1 6 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1996 0–3 0.0% #765 1,616 1 6 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33
32 1997 2–7 22.2% #379 1,574 1 6 — — — — — — —