H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pat Cash vs Paolo Cane H2H: 0-1
Paolo Cane holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paolo Cane leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Paolo Cane won the 1987 Milan third round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1987* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Paolo Cane | 6-3 7-6 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Pat Cash | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |