H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Pat Cash vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 0-1
Wojtek Fibak holds a 1–0 lead over Pat Cash in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Wojtek Fibak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1982 Rome second round 6-4 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 1982* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Wojtek Fibak | 6-4 6-0 | Pat Cash | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Pat Cash | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |
| 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |