H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Pat Cramer vs Jaime Pinto Bravo H2H: 1-0

Pat Cramer holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Pinto Bravo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cramer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pat Cramer won the 1973 Charleston round of 16 7-6 1-6 6-3.

RSA Age 79 Right-Handed
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
CHI Age 86 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pat Cramer 7-6 1-6 6-3 Jaime Pinto Bravo Match data Mar 16, 1973* R16 Charleston ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Pat Cramer #389 #95 0 1,664 58 103 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jaime Pinto Bravo 1,625 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Pat Cramer Jaime Pinto Bravo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1968 1–1 50.0% 1,497 0 0
22 1969 3–2 60.0% 1,513 0 0
23 1970 2–2 50.0% 1,530 0 0
24 1971 7–9 43.8% 1,518 0 0
25 1972 18–19 48.6% 1,590 0 0
26 1973 18–26 40.9% #106 1,559 0 0
27 1974 3–16 15.8% #160 1,455 0 0
28 1975 4–4 50.0% #99 1,526 0 0
29 1976 2–21 8.7% #191 1,419 0 0
30 1977 0–2 0.0% #214 1,417 0 0
32 1979 0–1 0.0% #389 1,412 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Pat Cramer Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1968 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1970 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1971 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1972 6 4 10 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 1973 8 10 18 44.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5%
27 1974 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
28 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1968 8 7 15 53.3%
29 1976 0 3 3 0.0% 2 15 17 11.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
30 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 1970 0 3 3 0.0%
31 1971 1 2 3 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2%
32 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 4 4 0.0%
33 1973 3 10 13 23.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
34 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 5 12 17 29.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
35 1975 9 11 20 45.0%
36 1976 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
37 1977 4 5 9 44.4%
38 1978 0 1 1 0.0%
39 1979 1 0 1 100.0%
43 1983 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 23 28 51 45.1% 16 41 57 28.1% 10 17 27 37.0% 9 17 26 34.6% 5 16 21 23.8% 49 73 122 40.2% 4 12 16 25.0% 1 13 14 7.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Pat Cramer Jaime Pinto Bravo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1968 1498 106.7 60.0% +1.60 0–1 +0.21
22 1969 1514 112.1 +38 54.5% +0.82 0–1 +0.40
23 1970 1531 102.7 +86 55.6% -0.22 0–1 +0.30
24 1971 1519 106.7 +126 -47 39.5% -0.74 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.2 +1.27
25 1972 1591 118.9 +85 -79 -25 51.0% +0.06 2–6 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 92.2 +2.53
26 1973 1559 119.8 +63 -43 -5 45.4% -0.36 2–7 (22%) 5–5 (50%) 96.0 +3.03
27 1974 1455 107.0 +55 +1 +66 18.4% -2.11 0–2 -0.13
28 1975 1526 119.0 +24 -33 50.0% -0.25 2–2 (50%) 3–0 (100%) 105.4 +0.36 1968 1540 107.1 -12 51.2% -0.02 2–1 (67%) -0.51
29 1976 1419 118.7 +70 -11 13.7% -2.73 0–3 (0%) 1–1 -1.24 1969 1513 111.4 -23 +33 30.0% -0.87 3–2 (60%) -0.45
30 1977 1418 116.4 20.0% -2.60 0–1 1–0 -0.38 1970 1487 106.9 -38 20.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.41
31 1971 1492 119.5 +50 -35 32.4% -1.15 0–1 1–1 +0.05
32 1979 1413 102.1 25.0% -2.00 0–1 -0.08 1972 1558 121.1 +15 -82 40.0% -0.67 5–2 (71%) 1–1 -0.63
33 1973 1554 117.6 -74 +55 38.4% -0.85 5–11 (31%) 3–4 (43%) 96.4 +1.26
34 1974 1448 108.8 -73 +96 -31 28.6% -1.62 1–9 (10%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 +1.72
35 1975 1507 124.1 +61 43.5% -0.33 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 101.1 +2.26
36 1976 1557 127.6 +43 41.9% -0.48 2–3 (40%) 0–1 -0.04
37 1977 1603 118.1 +22 40.9% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 1–1 +0.15
38 1978 1583 99.4 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.19
39 1979 1595 100.5 66.7% +0.67 1–0 +0.22
43 1983 1576 97.8 33.3% -2.33 0–1 +0.21
Career 1665 121.3 +72 -32 -10 39.6% -0.76 8–26 (24%) 12–14 (46%) 90.6 +3.99 1626 122.8 -62 +33 -14 37.6% -0.82 24–37 (39%) 10–15 (40%) 96.8 +2.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.