H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Patrice Beust vs Mark Cox H2H: 0-1

Mark Cox holds a 1–0 lead over Patrice Beust in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Cox leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Cox won the 1969 Bournemouth round of 16 6-3 0-6 6-2 9-11 6-4.

FRA Age 81 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
GBR Age 83 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Cox 6-3 0-6 6-2 9-11 6-4 Patrice Beust Match data May 2, 1969* R16 Bournemouth ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patrice Beust #953 #308 0 1,534 15 30 33.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mark Cox #486 #12 0 2,023 406 272 59.9% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patrice Beust Mark Cox
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1968 4–5 44.4% 1,495 0 0
24 1969 6–9 40.0% 1,489 0 0 1968 52–23 69.3% 1,715 0 0
25 1970 1–2 33.3% 1,505 0 0 1969 35–16 68.6% 1,838 0 2
26 1971 1–3 25.0% 1,498 0 0 1970 39–31 55.7% 1,800 0 3
27 1972 0–2 0.0% 1,464 0 0 1971 27–31 46.6% 1,819 0 3
28 1973 0–1 0.0% 1,451 0 0 1972 43–29 59.7% 1,874 0 5
29 1974 2–3 40.0% 1,458 0 0 1973 56–28 66.7% #22 1,894 0 8
30 1975 1–3 25.0% #308 1,410 0 0 1974 24–16 60.0% #30 1,833 0 8
31 1976 0–1 0.0% #360 1,392 0 0 1975 30–12 71.4% #25 1,934 0 11
32 1977 0–1 0.0% #322 1,391 0 0 1976 22–15 59.5% #17 1,965 0 12
33 1977 35–21 62.5% #26 1,828 0 13
34 1978 15–16 48.4% #68 1,769 0 13
35 1979 17–16 51.5% #76 1,789 0 13
36 1980 11–13 45.8% #140 1,675 0 13
37 1981 0–5 0.0% 1,599 0 13

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patrice Beust Mark Cox
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 1968 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1969 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1968 24 11 35 68.6% 18 8 26 69.2% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 1970 1 2 3 33.3% 1969 11 5 16 68.8% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7%
26 1971 1 3 4 25.0% 1970 10 9 19 52.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 12 9 21 57.1% 3 7 10 30.0%
27 1972 0 2 2 0.0% 1971 9 11 20 45.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
28 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 14 9 23 60.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 19 14 33 57.6%
29 1974 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1973 11 4 15 73.3% 10 11 21 47.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 25 11 36 69.4%
30 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9%
31 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 22 6 28 78.6%
32 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 9 2 11 81.8% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
33 1977 8 8 16 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
34 1978 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8%
35 1979 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
36 1980 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
37 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 0 2 2 0.0% 7 20 27 25.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 126 83 209 60.3% 89 65 154 57.8% 60 38 98 61.2% 131 86 217 60.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patrice Beust Mark Cox
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
23 1968 1495 104.2 +75 -39 41.7% -0.58 0–2 -0.21
24 1969 1490 105.4 +93 +19 39.5% -0.63 0–2 -0.02 1968 1715 125.1 +101 -20 -76 64.9% +1.14 9–9 (50%) +2.87
25 1970 1506 102.6 +18 44.4% -1.44 -0.39 1969 1839 129.2 +75 -68 -126 60.3% +0.67 12–5 (71%) +4.09
26 1971 1499 103.7 +17 22.2% -2.78 -0.11 1970 1800 135.6 -58 +55 +20 55.8% +0.34 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) -1.59
27 1972 1464 96.3 0.0% -3.00 +0.11 1971 1819 144.9 -45 +46 -3 47.1% -0.09 6–6 (50%) 13–13 (50%) -7.37
28 1973 1451 98.8 0.0% -2.50 +0.08 1972 1874 146.7 -12 +65 -36 56.3% +0.44 18–12 (60%) 15–11 (58%) -2.93
29 1974 1459 100.2 +52 41.7% -1.17 1–1 1–1 +0.39 1973 1894 146.3 +68 -87 +21 61.9% +0.79 18–9 (67%) 14–12 (54%) -0.98
30 1975 1410 92.5 0.0% -4.14 +0.59 1974 1833 142.2 +74 -51 +60 60.8% +0.62 3–7 (30%) 14–9 (61%) -0.76
31 1976 1393 99.4 25.0% -0.75 0–1 +0.18 1975 1934 154.1 +99 -157 -28 66.7% +1.39 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) -0.83
32 1977 1391 111.6 25.0% -1.50 -0.14 1976 1965 146.6 +85 -198 -95 52.6% -0.01 12–4 (75%) 8–6 (57%) -3.40
33 1977 1828 146.3 +95 -114 +115 57.0% +0.45 11–3 (79%) 7–11 (39%) -0.20
34 1978 1770 142.4 +56 -48 +123 50.0% +0.15 3–5 (38%) 5–1 (83%) -1.06
35 1979 1790 141.2 +18 -86 +110 53.0% +0.22 3–6 (33%) 6–6 (50%) -1.30
36 1980 1676 120.6 +49 -18 +194 46.8% -0.26 4–4 (50%) 7–6 (54%) +1.71
37 1981 1599 106.1 21.4% -1.79 0–2 1–1 -0.05
Career 1535 104.2 +84 +7 +52 33.3% -1.30 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.6 +1.12 2023 146.1 +46 -36 +21 57.2% +0.50 114–85 (57%) 96–88 (52%) 101.1 -1.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.