H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patricio Cornejo vs Arthur Ashe H2H: 1-2
Arthur Ashe holds a 2–1 lead over Patricio Cornejo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Arthur Ashe leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Arthur Ashe won the 1969 Cincinnati fourth round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHI
Age 82
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1969* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Arthur Ashe | 6-3 6-4 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
| Jul 26, 1968* | Haverford | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Arthur Ashe | 6-1 6-4 | Patricio Cornejo | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1968* | Milwaukee | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Patricio Cornejo | 4-6 12-10 6-4 | Arthur Ashe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patricio Cornejo | #335 | #65 | 0 | 1,708 | 142 | 202 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arthur Ashe | #99 | #2 | 0 | 2,255 | 800 | 258 | 75.6% | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 | 49 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patricio Cornejo | Arthur Ashe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 24 | 1968 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 73–12 | 85.9% | — | 1,955 | 1 | 11 |
| 25 | 1969 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 77–24 | 76.2% | — | 1,958 | 1 | 12 |
| 26 | 1970 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 94–25 | 79.0% | — | 2,084 | 2 | 21 |
| 27 | 1971 | 13–20 | 39.4% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 70–28 | 71.4% | — | 2,094 | 2 | 24 |
| 28 | 1972 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 65–26 | 71.4% | — | 2,137 | 2 | 28 |
| 29 | 1973 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 69–30 | 69.7% | #10 | 1,965 | 2 | 30 |
| 30 | 1974 | 20–32 | 38.5% | #66 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 84–27 | 75.7% | #7 | 2,040 | 2 | 33 |
| 31 | 1975 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #138 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 102–23 | 81.6% | #4 | 2,132 | 3 | 41 |
| 32 | 1976 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #108 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 64–21 | 75.3% | #12 | 1,965 | 3 | 46 |
| 33 | 1977 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #69 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #130 | 1,896 | 3 | 46 |
| 34 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #172 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,992 | 3 | 49 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 30–13 | 69.8% | #7 | 1,911 | 3 | 49 |