H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patrick Baur vs Paul Annacone H2H: 0-1
Paul Annacone holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Baur in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1988 Stockholm second round 6-2 6-7 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1988* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Paul Annacone | 6-2 6-7 7-6 | Patrick Baur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Baur | #571 | #74 | 476 | 1,697 | 67 | 107 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Baur | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #178 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #192 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #82 | 1,494 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #130 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #257 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #380 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |