H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Baur vs Raul Antonio Viver H2H: 1-0
Patrick Baur holds a 1–0 lead over Raul Antonio Viver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrick Baur leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Baur won the 1992 Sao Paulo third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 65
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 1992* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Patrick Baur | 6-1 6-3 | Raul Antonio Viver | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Baur | #571 | #74 | 476 | 1,697 | 67 | 107 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Raul Antonio Viver | #957 | #94 | 267 | 1,566 | 20 | 49 | 29.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Baur | Raul Antonio Viver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #300 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #325 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #300 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #178 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #192 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #169 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #136 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #282 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #82 | 1,494 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #130 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #153 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #257 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #260 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #180 | 1,589 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #132 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #264 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,404 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #380 | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #524 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |