H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Patrick McEnroe vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 0-1
Hicham Arazi holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick McEnroe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hicham Arazi leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hicham Arazi won the 1997 Doha fourth round 2-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 52
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 1997* | Doha | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Hicham Arazi | 2-6 7-5 7-5 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick McEnroe | #1,303 | #28 | 990 | 1,842 | 140 | 164 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Hicham Arazi | #793 | #22 | 1,240 | 1,864 | 202 | 213 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick McEnroe | Hicham Arazi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #494 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #141 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #356 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #79 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #120 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #38 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1991 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #36 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1992 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #30 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #25 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #52 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #408 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #62 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #699 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #897 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |