H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick McEnroe vs Jacco Eltingh H2H: 1-2
Jacco Eltingh holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick McEnroe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Jacco Eltingh leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jacco Eltingh won the 1995 Australian Open fourth round 6-4 6-4 6-7(7) 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 1995* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Jacco Eltingh | 6-4 6-4 6-7(7) 5-7 6-4 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1993* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Patrick McEnroe | 7-5 6-3 | Jacco Eltingh | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jacco Eltingh | 7-6(5) 2-6 1-6 6-4 12-10 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick McEnroe | #1,303 | #28 | 990 | 1,842 | 140 | 164 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jacco Eltingh | #1,378 | #19 | 1,332 | 1,874 | 124 | 140 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick McEnroe | Jacco Eltingh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #128 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #114 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #494 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #78 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #356 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #63 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #120 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #23 | 1,828 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1991 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #36 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #43 | 1,771 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1992 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #307 | 1,634 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #604 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1994 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1995 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #408 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #699 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |