H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick McEnroe vs Jim Pugh H2H: 0-1
Jim Pugh holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick McEnroe in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jim Pugh leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jim Pugh won the 1988 San Francisco third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1988* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jim Pugh | 6-1 6-2 | Patrick McEnroe | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick McEnroe | #1,303 | #28 | 990 | 1,842 | 140 | 164 | 46.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Jim Pugh | #1,147 | #37 | 423 | 1,832 | 85 | 95 | 47.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick McEnroe | Jim Pugh | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1985 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #621 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1987 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,398 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #494 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #356 | 1,408 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #99 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #120 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1991 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #36 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1992 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #60 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #121 | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1994 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #397 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1995 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #34 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1074 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1996 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1997 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #408 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #699 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |