H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Charlie Pasarell H2H: 0-2
Charlie Pasarell holds a 2–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Charlie Pasarell leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Charlie Pasarell won the 1974 Caracas round-robin match 4-6 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 82
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 1974 | Caracas | ATP 250 | RR | Hard | Charlie Pasarell | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| Aug 23, 1973* | Toronto | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Charlie Pasarell | 6-7 6-3 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Charlie Pasarell | #312 | #35 | 0 | 1,939 | 302 | 275 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Charlie Pasarell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 43–31 | 58.1% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 26–32 | 44.8% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 40–31 | 56.3% | #47 | 1,834 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #51 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #63 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #56 | 1,815 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #71 | 1,650 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #200 | 1,607 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #312 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |