H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Pat Cramer H2H: 0-1
Pat Cramer holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cramer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pat Cramer won the 1972 Wimbledon second round 6-3 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 79
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1972* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Pat Cramer | 6-3 7-5 6-4 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pat Cramer | #389 | #95 | 0 | 1,668 | 62 | 103 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Pat Cramer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #106 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #160 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #99 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–20 | 9.1% | #191 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #196 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #389 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |