H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Rod Laver H2H: 0-1
Rod Laver holds a 1–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rod Laver leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rod Laver won the 1975 Boston second round 7-5 6-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 87
Left-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 1975* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Rod Laver | 7-5 6-7 6-0 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Rod Laver | #662 | #3 | 0 | 2,300 | 576 | 147 | 79.7% | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 72 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Rod Laver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 73–19 | 79.3% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 13 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 97–14 | 87.4% | — | 2,161 | 5 | 29 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,213 | 5 | 42 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 85–20 | 81.0% | — | 2,155 | 5 | 49 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 50–16 | 75.8% | — | 2,016 | 5 | 54 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 67–16 | 80.7% | #8 | 2,088 | 5 | 61 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 45–10 | 81.8% | #4 | 2,115 | 5 | 67 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 52–13 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,087 | 5 | 72 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #73 | 1,995 | 5 | 72 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #124 | 1,927 | 5 | 72 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #216 | 1,917 | 5 | 72 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,901 | 5 | 72 |