H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Tom Okker H2H: 0-2
Tom Okker holds a 2–0 lead over Patrick Proisy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1969 Brussels third round 8-6 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 82
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 1969* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Tom Okker | 8-6 4-6 6-4 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
| Jul 10, 1968 | King's Cup 2r | ATP 250 | RR | Carpet | Tom Okker | 6-3 6-2 | Patrick Proisy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tom Okker | #438 | #3 | 0 | 2,198 | 672 | 279 | 70.7% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 37 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Tom Okker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 89–23 | 79.5% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–25 | 77.5% | — | 2,009 | 0 | 15 |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 59–27 | 68.6% | — | 1,948 | 0 | 20 |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1971 | 74–31 | 70.5% | — | 2,007 | 0 | 22 |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 69–31 | 69.0% | — | 2,041 | 0 | 23 |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 91–23 | 79.8% | #4 | 2,166 | 0 | 30 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 65–19 | 77.4% | #6 | 2,061 | 0 | 33 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 39–13 | 75.0% | #11 | 2,068 | 0 | 35 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,956 | 0 | 35 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,931 | 0 | 36 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,879 | 0 | 36 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #56 | 1,772 | 0 | 37 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #107 | 1,715 | 0 | 37 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 37 |