H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Patrick Proisy vs Tony Roche H2H: 1-0
Patrick Proisy holds a 1–0 lead over Tony Roche in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrick Proisy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Proisy won the 1974 Miami Wct fourth round 3-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 76
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 81
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1974* | Miami Wct | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Patrick Proisy | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | Tony Roche | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Proisy | #232 | #23 | 0 | 1,876 | 220 | 193 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Tony Roche | #166 | #8 | 0 | 2,135 | 360 | 191 | 65.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 21 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Proisy | Tony Roche | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 36–21 | 63.2% | — | 1,708 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #41 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 53–35 | 60.2% | — | 1,839 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1974 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #69 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 86–30 | 74.1% | — | 1,970 | 0 | 12 |
| 25 | 1975 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #43 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 55–17 | 76.4% | — | 2,060 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | 1976 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #104 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 16 |
| 27 | 1977 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #44 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1972 | 19–15 | 55.9% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 17 |
| 28 | 1978 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 | 1973 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 17 |
| 29 | 1979 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #93 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #27 | 1,929 | 0 | 18 |
| 30 | 1980 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #158 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 31–13 | 70.5% | #12 | 1,962 | 0 | 18 |
| 31 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,560 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #50 | 2,016 | 0 | 20 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #19 | 1,918 | 0 | 20 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #32 | 1,843 | 0 | 21 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #166 | 1,797 | 0 | 21 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 21 |