H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Arnaud Boetsch H2H: 1-1
Patrick Rafter and Arnaud Boetsch are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arnaud Boetsch leads 1–0 on clay, while Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 1998 Antwerp third round 6-2 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 57
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1998* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-2 7-6(8) | Arnaud Boetsch | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1995* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Arnaud Boetsch | 6-4 6-4 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Arnaud Boetsch | #1,323 | #12 | 1,611 | 1,915 | 217 | 196 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Arnaud Boetsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #435 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #275 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #176 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #27 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1993 | 42–24 | 63.6% | #20 | 1,900 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1994 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1995 | 45–33 | 57.7% | #14 | 1,887 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1996 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #33 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1997 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #106 | 1,644 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #305 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #580 | 1,574 | 0 | 3 |