H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Patrick Rafter vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 2-3

Cedric Pioline holds a 3–2 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Cedric Pioline won the 2000 Roland Garros second round 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4.

AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 3
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 2, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Cedric Pioline #6 7-6(5) 6-3 6-4 Patrick Rafter #24 Match data
Sep 1, 1999* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Cedric Pioline #26 4-6 4-6 6-3 7-5 1-0 (ret.) Patrick Rafter #4 Match data
Feb 20, 1998* Antwerp ATP 250 R16 Hard Patrick Rafter #3 6-4 7-6(2) Cedric Pioline #18 Match data
Oct 30, 1997* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Patrick Rafter #3 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Nov 2, 1994* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Cedric Pioline #43 6-4 6-2 Patrick Rafter #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,104 332 177 65.2% 2 2 0 0 7 11
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patrick Rafter Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0
20 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,619 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,803 0 1 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,777 0 1 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,761 0 1 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,035 1 2 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,010 2 8 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,933 2 9 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 2000 30–16 65.2% #15 1,889 2 10 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,989 2 11 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5