H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Galo Blanco H2H: 1-1
Patrick Rafter and Galo Blanco are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on clay, while Galo Blanco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Galo Blanco won the 2000 US Open first round 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2000* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Galo Blanco | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | QF | Clay | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 7-6(3) 6-3 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |