H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 3-0
Patrick Rafter holds a 3–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 2–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2000* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 6-1 6-1 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 6-1 7-5 6-4 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
| Jun 14, 1996* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 6-2 6-1 | Gianluca Pozzi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Gianluca Pozzi | #1,466 | #40 | 864 | 1,783 | 172 | 257 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Gianluca Pozzi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #277 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #179 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1990 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #185 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1991 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #76 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1992 | 28–28 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1993 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #93 | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #138 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #107 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #101 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 22–27 | 44.9% | #61 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #94 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #155 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 |