H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Guillaume Raoux H2H: 1-2
Guillaume Raoux holds a 2–1 lead over Patrick Rafter in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Guillaume Raoux leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guillaume Raoux won the 1998 New Haven fourth round 7-6(8) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1998* | New Haven | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 7-6(8) 6-3 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1998* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-1 6-3 | Guillaume Raoux | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1997* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Guillaume Raoux | 6-4 7-6(5) | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Guillaume Raoux | #1,033 | #35 | 1,041 | 1,806 | 175 | 222 | 44.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Guillaume Raoux | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #448 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #104 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #93 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #85 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1994 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #115 | 1,572 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1995 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #77 | 1,566 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1996 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1997 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1998 | 24–27 | 47.1% | #53 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #137 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #668 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |