H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Patrick Rafter vs Hicham Arazi H2H: 5-0

Patrick Rafter holds a 5–0 lead over Hicham Arazi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 3–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 2001 Wimbledon round of 32 7-6(3) 6-4 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Patrick Rafter
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Hicham Arazi
MAR Age 52 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patrick Rafter #10 7-6(3) 6-4 7-5 Hicham Arazi #27 Match data Jul 1, 2001* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Patrick Rafter #17 6-3 6-4 Hicham Arazi #33 Match data Nov 11, 2000* SF Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Patrick Rafter #3 6-3 6-3 Hicham Arazi #37 Match data Oct 23, 1998* R16 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Patrick Rafter #3 4-6 4-6 6-3 6-3 6-1 Hicham Arazi #44 Match data Sep 2, 1998* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Patrick Rafter #3 6-3 3-6 6-3 Hicham Arazi #39 Match data Feb 26, 1998* R32 London ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Patrick Rafter #224 #1 3,673 2,105 333 178 65.2% 2 2 0 1 6 11
Hicham Arazi #793 #22 1,240 1,864 202 215 48.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Patrick Rafter Hicham Arazi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1991 0–1 0.0% #293 1,495 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1992 0–3 0.0% #243 1,456 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1993 11–11 50.0% #66 1,621 0 0 1994 0–1 0.0% #184 1,486 0 0
21 1994 43–26 62.3% #20 1,804 0 1 1995 1–5 16.7% #141 1,457 0 0
22 1995 29–23 55.8% #66 1,778 0 1 1996 12–17 41.4% #79 1,546 0 0
23 1996 25–20 55.6% #62 1,764 0 1 1997 28–27 50.9% #38 1,624 0 1
24 1997 63–26 70.8% #2 2,030 1 2 1998 23–28 45.1% #36 1,715 0 1
25 1998 58–20 74.4% #4 2,011 2 8 1999 27–27 50.0% #36 1,702 0 1
26 1999 31–16 66.0% #16 1,961 2 9 2000 31–26 54.4% #30 1,775 0 1
27 2000 31–17 64.6% #15 1,880 2 10 2001 30–23 56.6% #25 1,833 0 1
28 2001 42–15 73.7% #7 1,988 2 11 2002 14–21 40.0% #90 1,699 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2003 21–20 51.2% #52 1,718 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2004 15–18 45.5% #62 1,701 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2005 0–2 0.0% #897 1,664 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Patrick Rafter Hicham Arazi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1994 27 14 41 65.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1995 21 11 32 65.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1996 5 9 14 35.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1997 5 5 10 50.0% 19 14 33 57.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3%
24 1997 40 17 57 70.2% 10 3 13 76.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 1998 9 11 20 45.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 1998 40 10 50 80.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1999 5 8 13 38.5% 17 13 30 56.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1999 13 11 24 54.2% 7 3 10 70.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 2000 17 15 32 53.1% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4%
27 2000 13 10 23 56.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 12 9 21 57.1% 11 10 21 52.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2001 33 11 44 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2002 10 8 18 55.6% 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 8 15 46.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 3 8 62.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 9 10 19 47.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 204 103 307 66.4% 28 28 56 50.0% 66 23 89 74.2% 35 24 59 59.3% — 80 87 167 47.9% 77 84 161 47.8% 18 17 35 51.4% 27 27 54 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Patrick Rafter Hicham Arazi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1991 1496 102.9 +2.28 -2.79 0.506 39.0% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1992 1457 100.0 -2.19 +1.72 0.823 46.7% — — — 22.2% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1993 1622 136.3 +1.15 -0.18 0.967 49.7% -9 — -4 50.0% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 6–2 (75%) — +0.35 1994 1487 97.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.09
21 1994 1804 145.1 +3.43 -2.20 0.997 50.2% -27 -159 -76 58.6% +0.21 16–12 (57%) 23–10 (70%) — -0.58 1995 1457 106.7 — — — — +66 — — 29.4% -1.30 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.11
22 1995 1779 148.5 +2.26 -1.35 0.971 49.8% +63 -150 -102 52.2% +0.07 12–6 (67%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.96 1996 1546 121.8 — — — — +2 -25 +68 41.3% -0.65 7–6 (54%) 5–7 (42%) — +0.69
23 1996 1764 147.3 +4.50 +1.21 1.177 52.7% +12 -147 +37 57.0% +0.89 4–6 (40%) 5–13 (28%) — -0.78 1997 1625 136.9 — — — — -45 +82 -20 50.4% -0.07 11–9 (55%) 10–6 (63%) — +0.56
24 1997 2031 163.0 +5.33 +2.03 1.183 52.9% +9 -197 -179 62.0% +0.89 24–5 (83%) 20–22 (48%) — -3.40 1998 1716 146.6 — — — — -39 +16 -91 49.6% 0.00 5–11 (31%) 6–10 (38%) — -3.26
25 1998 2011 157.8 +6.57 +2.62 1.316 54.2% +18 -246 -117 66.8% +1.21 16–5 (76%) 23–19 (55%) — +0.93 1999 1702 141.7 — — — — -21 +82 — 47.4% -0.41 9–5 (64%) 14–8 (64%) — -3.32
26 1999 1961 149.8 +5.69 +2.07 1.255 53.4% -61 -140 +14 65.8% +1.21 4–4 (50%) 12–14 (46%) — -0.61 2000 1775 143.8 — — — — +25 -55 -150 53.7% +0.23 12–7 (63%) 5–10 (33%) — +0.15
27 2000 1880 143.7 +6.33 -0.70 1.186 52.5% -46 -112 +237 62.6% +0.90 7–6 (54%) 12–15 (44%) — -0.12 2001 1834 144.1 — — — — +20 -121 -176 53.4% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.90
28 2001 1989 159.0 +6.46 +1.48 1.241 53.4% -2 — +117 69.0% +1.14 9–7 (56%) 17–8 (68%) — -0.75 2002 1700 126.9 — — — — +97 -76 — 46.7% -0.31 3–5 (38%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.75
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1718 135.5 -0.40 +1.29 1.017 50.1% +50 -87 -83 51.0% +0.17 6–6 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.03
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1702 135.1 -0.45 +0.35 0.986 49.8% +29 -110 +6 46.0% -0.25 3–6 (33%) 7–9 (44%) — -0.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1665 97.8 -2.62 -3.75 0.527 39.2% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.02
Career — 2105 157.4 +4.84 +0.68 1.144 52.2% 0 -164 +17 61.2% +0.74 97–55 (64%) 132–115 (53%) 108.1 -1.15 — 1865 143.4 -0.48 +0.75 0.987 49.7% +14 -4 -63 48.9% -0.15 65–63 (51%) 79–72 (52%) 104.2 -1.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.