H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Jonathan Stark H2H: 2-1
Patrick Rafter holds a 2–1 lead over Jonathan Stark in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patrick Rafter leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Jonathan Stark leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 1995 Washington third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 1995* | Washington | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-1 6-4 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1995* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 1-6 6-4 7-5 | Jonathan Stark | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1995* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jonathan Stark | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Jonathan Stark | #829 | #36 | 913 | 1,801 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Jonathan Stark | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #403 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1007 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #243 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1995 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1996 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #68 | 1,730 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1997 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #96 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1998 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #266 | 1,576 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #300 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #512 | 1,574 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 |