H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Leander Paes H2H: 1-0
Patrick Rafter holds a 1–0 lead over Leander Paes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patrick Rafter won the 1998 Chennai semifinal 6-3 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 53
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1998* | Chennai | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-3 7-6(5) | Leander Paes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Leander Paes | #1,102 | #73 | 611 | 1,727 | 48 | 74 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Leander Paes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #260 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #139 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1997 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #122 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1998 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #91 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1999 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #188 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1032 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |