H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Patrick Rafter vs Marc Rosset H2H: 2-2
Patrick Rafter and Marc Rosset are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Marc Rosset leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Patrick Rafter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Marc Rosset won the 1998 Antwerp semifinal 7-6(4) 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 55
Right-Handed
201 cm / 6'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 1998* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Marc Rosset | 7-6(4) 7-6(2) | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1996* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Patrick Rafter | 4-6 6-3 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marc Rosset | 6-4 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Patrick Rafter | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Patrick Rafter | 6-2 6-3 | Marc Rosset | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patrick Rafter | #224 | #1 | 3,673 | 2,104 | 332 | 177 | 65.2% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 11 |
| Marc Rosset | #1,490 | #9 | 2,069 | 1,950 | 398 | 334 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Patrick Rafter | Marc Rosset | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #293 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–2 | 77.8% | #45 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #22 | 1,811 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1993 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 18–28 | 39.1% | #60 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1994 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #20 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #35 | 1,826 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1995 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #66 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #16 | 1,922 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1996 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #62 | 1,761 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #14 | 1,925 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1997 | 63–26 | 70.8% | #2 | 2,035 | 1 | 2 | 1995 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #15 | 1,814 | 0 | 10 |
| 25 | 1998 | 58–20 | 74.4% | #4 | 2,010 | 2 | 8 | 1996 | 31–27 | 53.4% | #22 | 1,771 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1999 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #16 | 1,933 | 2 | 9 | 1997 | 32–31 | 50.8% | #31 | 1,630 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | 2000 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,889 | 2 | 10 | 1998 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,749 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 2001 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #7 | 1,989 | 2 | 11 | 1999 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #45 | 1,658 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #28 | 1,723 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,597 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,586 | 0 | 14 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #214 | 1,546 | 0 | 14 |